Download Pensamiento politico de la emancipacion (1790-1825), I by Jose Luis Romero y Luis Alberto Romero PDF

By Jose Luis Romero y Luis Alberto Romero
Read or Download Pensamiento politico de la emancipacion (1790-1825), I PDF
Best history_1 books
- Junkers - Von der J1 bis zur F13
- Anna Maria Falconbridge: Narrative of Two Voyages to the River Sierra Leone during the Years 1791-1792-1793 (Liverpool Historical Studies , Vol 17)
- History of the Second World War Part 17: Civilians in the Front Line
- Die zweite Große Koalition: Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel 2005-2009
Extra info for Pensamiento politico de la emancipacion (1790-1825), I
Sample text
The Son and the Spirit are Divine, Co-eternal and of the same substance as the Father, and belief in the Trinity does not destroy belief in the unicity of God. There seems to be little room for doubt that this was his belief in 1701. His main enemies had always been the Socinians - real or alleged. In a passage that has an echo in the manuscript ll he 7 Cf. J. O'Higgins, The Journal of Theological Studies (Oxford), XXII, part 2, 1971, pp. 484-490. "Hume and the Deists: a Contrast in Religious Approaches", and O'Higgins, Anthony Collins, the Man and his Works (The Hague, 1970), pp.
De Vallone rejected the idea of any covenant between God and Adam. It would be political and unfitting. But after Adam's sin the covenants with Noah and Abraham were comprehensible. De Vallone considered that it would be unjust to punish Adam's descendants for his sin, but that after that sin it was to be expected that his progeny should be born corrupt, totally concerned with the well-being of their bodies and without love of God. It is for our own sins that God punishes us and this inborn corruption de Vallone considers to be our own sin.
We ourselves are corrupt in every way,S while God is infmitely perfect and the source of man's being? But, strictly speaking, God sees nothing outside himself,lO and is supremely one. The Son and the Spirit are Divine, Co-eternal and of the same substance as the Father, and belief in the Trinity does not destroy belief in the unicity of God. There seems to be little room for doubt that this was his belief in 1701. His main enemies had always been the Socinians - real or alleged. In a passage that has an echo in the manuscript ll he 7 Cf.